Lakhan Singh Hembrom Vs the State of Jharkhand

¶1

2026:JHHC:20877

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 5038 of 2026

¶3

Lakhan Singh Hembrom, aged about 27 years, Son of Saluka Hembrom … … Petitioner

¶4

¶5

CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY

¶6

¶7

For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajesh Ranjan Srivastava, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Azeemuddin, APP

¶8

¶9

03 /14.07.2026 Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties.

¶10

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 15.01.2026 in connection with Chaibasa Mahila P.S. Case No. 02 of 2026for the offences registered under Sections 69 of the B.N.S., 2023, pending in the Court of learned JMFC, West Singhbhum, Chaibasa.

¶11

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and the statement recorded under Section 183 of BNSS which reveals that the victim has stated that she developed love relationship with the petitioner while she was staying in a hostel. The victim was major and the charge has been framed under Section 69 of BNS, 2023.

¶12

4. Learned counsel for the opposite party-State has opposed the prayer for bail and has submitted that as per the allegation, the petitioner has established relationship with the victim on the pretext of marriage and there is direct allegation against the petitioner.

¶13

5. To this, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that three witnesses have been examined including the victim.

¶14

6. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the statement of the victim recorded under Section 183 BNSS where she has stated that she has love relationship with the petitioner and the victim has already been examined, the petitioner above named is directed to be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned JMFC, West

¶15

2026:JHHC:20877

¶16

Singhbhum, Chaibasa, in connection withChaibasa Mahila P.S. Case No. 02 of 2026 on the following conditions:

¶17

(i) If the victim has not been examined as witness in the trial so far, the petitioner shall not be released.

¶18

(ii) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner.

¶19

(iii) The other bailor should be his close relative.

¶20

(iv) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner.

¶21

(v) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court.

¶22

(vi) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below.

¶23

7. Let this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through FAX/email.

¶24

8. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions.

¶25

(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.)

¶26

Dated: 14.07.2026 Uploaded on 14.07.2026 Pramanik/

¶27

2

Lakhan Singh Hembrom v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Lakhan Singh Hembrom v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ansul Arif Alias Asnul Vs the State of Jharkhand

Nirmal Oraon Vs State of Jharkhand

Manish Tudu Vs the State of Jharkhand

Manjit Toppo Vs the State of Jharkhand

Kailash Kumar Das Vs the State of Jharkhand

Kawaldi Das Vs State of Jharkhand