Dilkhush Ansari v. State of Jharkhand
Case brief
What is this about?
Jharkhand High Court, Ranchi (neutral citation 2026:JHHC:19753; uploaded 07.07.2026) — B.A. No.3611 of 2026, decided 06.07.2026 by ANANDA SEN, J. Regular bail refused in a cyber-fraud case: petitioner's seized mobile no. 7061737969 was shown fraudulently as BLINKIT Customer Care in Google and used to siphon Rs. 80,000/- from the complainant's bank account; investigation complete; earlier bail rejected 12.03.2026 in BA No. 1663 of 2026. Offences: Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61(2) Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita; Sections 66B, 66C, 66D, 84(C) IT Act. Application under Sections 483 & 484 BNSS, 2023 dismissed; Cyber PS Case No. 175 of 2025, Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum-Cyber Crime, Special Court, Deoghar; trial to conclude within six months. Counsel: Rahul Ranjan for petitioner; Naveen Kr. Ganjhu, APP for the State.
What did the court decide?
From the case diary, the Court found that the mobile no. 7061737969 seized from the petitioner was showing fraudulently as BLINKIT Customer Care in Google, and that calling from the said number he siphoned a sum of Rs. 80,000/- from the bank account of the complainant.