Allowed¶13

Dayanand Turi v. State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC24 Feb 2026B.A./340/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Dayanand Turi bail application; B.A. No. 340 of 2026; High Court of Jharkhand, Ranchi; Justice Ananda Sen; 24-02-2026; Sections 483 & 484 BNSS 2023; Sections 96, 143, 3(5) Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita; kidnapping of informant's daughter; Mirzachowki Police Station Case No.77 of 2024; S.T. No.185 of 2025; Additional Sessions Judge-I Sahibganj; P.W.-1 informant and P.W.-2 victim declared hostile denying prosecution case; bail granted; bail bond Rs. 10,000 with two sureties; bailor condition close relative with landed property in Jharkhand.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted: release ordered on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each before Additional Sessions Judge-I, Sahibganj, conditioned on one bailor being a close relative with landed property in Jharkhand. ¶13

Dayanand Turi Vs State of Jharkhand — Bail and Remand | Jharkhand HC (2026)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶13

Issue for consideration

Whether the petitioner, in custody for an alleged offence punishable under Sections 96, 143 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, should be granted bail.

¶7

Court's answer

Because the informant (P.W.-1) and the victim (P.W.-2) have denied the prosecution case during trial, the court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

¶13

Ratio / Principle

The petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing a bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Sahibganj, subject to the condition that one of the bailors be a close relative of the petitioner having sufficient landed property in his own name within the State of Jharkhand.

¶14

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi (B.A. No. 340 of 2026, decided 24th February 2026 by Ananda Sen, J.) granted bail to Dayanand Turi, who sought release under Sections 483 & 484 of BNSS, 2023 while in custody for an alleged offence punishable under Sections 96, 143 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the charge-sheet having been filed under Sections 96 and 3(5). The allegation was kidnapping of the informant's daughter in Mirzachowki Police Station Case No.77 of 2024 (S.T. No.185 of 2025). With the trial in progress, the victim (P.W.-2) and the informant (P.W.-1) had both denied the prosecution case and were declared hostile; on that basis the court inclined to grant bail. The petitioner was directed to be released on a bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Sahibganj, subject to the condition that one bailor be a close relative possessing sufficient landed property in his own name within Jharkhand. No precedent was cited; no dissenting opinion exists.

Dayanand Turi v. State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dayanand Turi v. State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nurul Hoda Vs State of Jharkhand

Brajendra Prasad Singh Vs the State of Jharkhand

Binod Kumar Kuwanr Vs the State of Jharkhand

Kausar Ansari @ Kaushar Ansari Vs the State of Jharkhand

Vinita Kumari Vs the State of Jharkhand

Rekha Upadhayay Vs the State of Jharkhand