Allowed¶19

Roushan Srivastava Alias Roushan Kumar Alias Roshan Kumar v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC10 Apr 2026A.B.A./1535/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail application; High Court of Jharkhand, Ranchi; A.B.A. No. 1535 of 2026; Sections 364 and 34 IPC; Hunterganj P.S. Case No. 47 of 2022; Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Chatra; name surfaced only on confessional statement; informant's petition alleging false implication; direction to surrender within two weeks; release on terms and sureties as deemed fit; Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi; decided 10.04.2026.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail: petitioner directed to surrender before the learned court within two weeks, whereupon the learned court shall release the petitioner on such terms and conditions or sureties as it may deem fit and proper. ¶19

Roushan Srivastava Alias Roushan Kumar Alias Roshan Kumar Vs the State of Jharkhand — Jharkhand HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

2026:JHHC:10393

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1535 of 2026

¶3

----

¶4

Roushan Srivastava @ Roushan Kumar @ Roshan Kumar, aged about 24 years, Son of Vipin Prasad @ Vipin Srivastava, resident of Village-Kubba, P.O.- Kubba P.S.- Hunterganj, District- Chatra.

¶5

.... Petitioner

¶6

-- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party

¶7

¶8

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI

¶9

For the Petitioner :- Mr. Sushant Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the State :- Mrs. Vandana Bharti, A.P.P.

¶10

¶11

02 /10.04.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel appearing for the State.

¶12

2. The petitioner is apprehending their arrest in connection with Hunterganj P.S. Case No.47 of 2022 for the alleged offences registered under Sections 364, 34 of the Indian Penal Code pending in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1^st Class, Chatra.

¶13

3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the name of the petitioner has come only on the confessional statement and petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that when it has come to the knowledge of the victim he has filed the petition before the learned Sessions Judge in A.B.P. stating that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case.

¶14

--1--

¶15

A.B.A. No. 1535 of 2026

¶16

2026:JHHC:10393

¶17

4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposed the prayer

¶18

and submits that the name of the petitioner has come on the confessional statement.

¶19

5. Considering that the name of the petitioner has come on the confessional statement and petition filed by the informant is at page-16 of the anticipatory bail application wherein it has been stated that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and in that view of the matter the petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned Court within two weeks and the learned Court shall release the petitioner on such terms and conditions or the sureties as the learned Court may deem fit and proper.

¶20

(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)

¶21

Dated 10.04.2026 Simran/

¶22

--2--

¶23

A.B.A. No. 1535 of 2026

Roushan Srivastava Alias Roushan Kumar Alias Roshan Kumar v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Roushan Srivastava Alias Roushan Kumar Alias Roshan Kumar v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jasimuddin Ansari Vs the State of Jharkhand

Satish Parsad Gupta @ Satish Kumar Vs State of Jharkhand

Soma Munda Vs the State of Jharkhand

MD Samsul Vs the State of Jharkhand

Dasrath Sahu Vs the State of Jharkhand

Md. Mustkim Ansari @ Mustakim Ansari Vs State of Jharkhand