Allowed¶17

Kis Ranjan Yadav Alias Kish Ranjan Yadav v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC8 Apr 2026A.B.A./1435/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail allowed by direction to surrender and release on bail – A.B.A. No. 1435 of 2026, Jharkhand High Court, Ranchi – Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi – Kolebira P.S. Case No. 43 of 2023 – Sections 414/34 IPC – Section 11(D)(F) Prevention of Cruelty to Animal Act – Sections 12(1) and 12(2) Jharkhand Bovine Animal Prohibition of Slaughter Act – parity with co-accused owners of pick-up vans granted anticipatory bail in A.B.A. No. 9776 of 2023 and A.B.A. Nos. 21 and 4915 of 2024 – no criminal antecedent – CJM Simdega.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail: petitioner directed to surrender before the learned court within two weeks and to be released on bail on such terms, conditions and sureties as the learned court may deem fit and proper. ¶17

Kis Ranjan Yadav Alias Kish Ranjan Yadav Vs the State of Jharkhand — Jharkhand HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

[2026:JHHC:10052]

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1435 of 2026

¶3

Kis Ranjan Yadav @ Kish Ranjan Yadav, aged about 62 years, S/o Bhavana Yadav, R/o Village-Saraiya, Raham, P.O. and P.S.-Saraiya, District Bhojpur, Jharkhand.

¶4

..... … Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Jharkhand.

¶7

..... … Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI -----For the Petitioner : Mr. Mohit Prakash, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Sinha, A.P.P. ------

¶8

03/ 08.04.2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P

¶9

for the State.

¶10

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Kolebira P.S. Case No. 43 of 2023, for the alleged offences under Sections 414/34 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 11(D)(F) of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animal Act and Section 12(1) and 12(2) of the Jharkhand Bovine Animal Prohibition of Slaughter Act, pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Simdega.

¶11

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner happened to be the owner of the pick-up van and the allegations are made that in the said pick up van, bovine animals were being transported. He further submits that the other owners of the pickup vans have also been implicated in this case, however, they have been provided the privilege of anticipatory bail in A.B.A. No. 9776 of 2023 and in A.B.A. Nos. 21 and 4915 of 2024. He also submits that the

¶12

petitioner is having no criminal antecedent and disclosure to that effect has been made in para-8 of the petition.

¶13

Learned A.P.P. appearing for the State has opposed the

¶14

-1-

¶15

[2026:JHHC:10052]

¶16

prayer and submits that the petitioner happened to be the owner of the pick-up van.

¶17

Considering that the other co-accused persons have already been provided the privilege of anticipatory bail in the aforementioned A.B.As. and further the petitioner is having no criminal antecedent and disclosure to that effect has been made in para-8 of the petition, in that view of the matter, the petitioner, named above, is directed to surrender before the learned Court within two weeks from today and the learned Court shall release the petitioner on such terms and conditions or the sureties as the learned Court may deem fit and proper.

¶18

Dated:-08.04.2026 Amitesh/-

¶19

-2-

Kis Ranjan Yadav Alias Kish Ranjan Yadav v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kis Ranjan Yadav Alias Kish Ranjan Yadav v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jagdish Prasad Singh Vs State of Jharkhand

Chandan Kumar Vs the State of Jharkhand

Sonu Kumar Vs the State of Jharkhand

Daljeet Kuar Vs State of Bihar Now Jharkhand

Sarfaraj @ Faiyaz @ Mohammad Sarfraz Ansari Vs State of Jharkhand

Rahul Kumar Vs the State of Jharkhand