Dismissed¶16

Dayal Munda v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC16 Feb 2026B.A./10342/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Dayal Munda v. The State of Jharkhand; B.A. No. 10342 of 2025; High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi; neutral citation 2026:JHHC:4417; decided 16.02.2026 by Deepak Roshan, J. Regular bail refused in a case under Sections 318(4), 274, 275, 3(5) of BNS and Section 47(a) of the Excise Act relating to a seized foreign liquor factory; petitioner in jail since 15.06.2025; contention of false implication and no recovery did not prevail; bail application dismissed.

What did the court decide?

Having regard to the gravity of the offence and the allegation against the petitioner, the Court was not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail at that stage. ¶15

Dayal Munda Vs the State of Jharkhand — Cheating and Forgery | Jharkhand HC (2026)

¶1

 2026:JHHC:4417

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

¶3

B.A. No. 10342 of 2025

¶4

Dayal Munda, aged about 20 years, son of late Soma Munda, R/o Marangi, P.O + P.S. Gidhour, DistrictChatra, Jharkhand. .… Petitioner

¶5

Versus The State of Jharkhand ..... Opposite Party

¶6

--------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN

¶7

¶8

For the Petitioner :Mr. Shailesh Kumar Pandey, Adv. For the Opposite Party : Mr. P.D. Agrawal, Adv.

¶9

¶10

03/Dated: 16.02.2026

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶12

2. The instant bail application has been preferred by the petitioner for grant of regular bail for the offences registered under Sections 318(4), 274, 275, 3(5) of BNS and Section 47 (a) of Excise Act.

¶13

3. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner is languishing in jail since 15.06.2025 and he has been falsely implicated in this case as no incriminating article has been recovered or seized from the possession of this petitioner and petitioner has no concerned with the seized foreign liquor factory.

¶14

4. Per Contra , learned APP has opposed the prayer for bail.

¶15

5. Having regard to the gravity of the offence and the allegation against the petitioner, I am not inclined to enlarge this petitioner on bail at this stage.

¶16

6. Accordingly, the instant bail application stands dismissed.

¶17

(Deepak Roshan, J.)

¶18

February 16, 2026 Uploaded on ……./…../2026 Fahim/

Dayal Munda v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dayal Munda v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ahmad Raza Khan Vs Ruksana Khatoon

Mother Teresa A.N.M Training School through Its Director Prahlad Mishra Vs the State of Jharkhand, through Its Secretary, Department of Health and Family Welfare

Prem Sagar Dubey Vs Union of India And Ors.

Sheetal Kumar Bid Vs the State of Jharkhand

Anil Mandal Vs the State of Jharkhand

Firoz Ansari Vs the State of Jharkhand