Dismissed¶¶29

Nalanda Engicon (P) Limited, Representative Mr. Bindeshwari Prasad Singh v. Jharkhand Urban Infrastructure Development Company Limited, through Its Managing Director

Jharkhand HC12 Nov 2025WPC/5433/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Withdrawal of writ petition permitted; W.P. (C) No. 5433 of 2025 dismissed as withdrawn; I.A. No. 14747 of 2025 allowed; interim orders vacated; pending applications disposed; parties: Nalanda Engicon (P) Ltd v. JUIDCO Ltd & officials and M/s Annai Infra Developers Pvt Ltd; advocates: Parth Jalan, Krishna Murari, Harsh Preet Singh; Bench: Chief Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan with Justice Rajesh Shankar; Jharkhand High Court, Ranchi; dated 12.11.2025; Neutral Citation 2025:JHHC:33809-DB; N.A.F.R.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the writ petition granted via I.A. No. 14747 of 2025; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; all interim orders vacated; pending applications disposed of. ¶¶29

Nalanda Engicon (P) Limited, Representative Mr. Bindeshwari Prasad Singh Vs Jharkhand Urban Infrastructure Development Company Limited, through Its Managing Director — Jharkhand HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Neutral Citation No. 2025:JHHC:33809-DB

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

¶3

I.A. No. 14747 of 2025

¶4

In / And

¶5

W.P. (C) No. 5433 of 2025

¶6

Nalanda Engicon (P) Limited, having its registered office at 4^th Floor, N.P Tower, Main Road, Kankarbagh, P.O and P.S Kankarbagh, DistPatna, 800020, State-Bihar, through its authorized representative Mr. Bindeshwari Prasad Singh, S/o Late Charitra Singh, aged about 60 years, having his place of residence at House No. C D/746, H.E.C Colony, Near Bengala School, Sector-2, P.O and P.S.Dhurva, DistRanchi.

¶7

... Petitioner

¶8

Versus

¶9

Jharkhand Urban Infrastructure Development Company Limited having its registered office at JUIDCO Bhawan, Kutchery Chowk, P.O GPO, P.S Kotwali, Dist-Ranchi through its Managing Director, officiating from his office at JUIDCO Bhawan, Kutchery Chowk, P.O GPO, P.S Kotwali, Dist-Ranchi

¶10

Project Director (Finance), Jharkhand Urban Infrastructure Development Company Limited, officiating from his office at JUIDCO Bhawan, Kutchery Chowk, P.O GPO, P.S Kotwali, DistRanchi

¶11

General Manager (PW), Jharkhand Urban Infrastructure Development Company Limited, officiating from his office at JUIDCO Bhawan, Kutchery Chowk, P.O-GPO, P.S- Kotwali, DistRanchi

¶12

Project Director (Admin), Jharkhand Urban Infrastructure Development Company Limited, officiating from his office at JUIDCO Bhawan, Kutchery Chowk, P.O GPO, P.S Kotwali, DistRanchi

¶13

Deputy Secretary cum Internal Financial Advisor, UD & HD, Government of Jharkhand, officiating from his office at JUIDCO Bhawan, Kutchery Chowk, P.O GPO, P.S Kotwali, Dist-Ranchi

¶14

Project Jharkhand Director (Tech), Urban Infrastructure Development Company Limited, officiating from his office at JUIDCO Bhawan, Kutchery Chowk, P.O GPO, P.S Kotwali, DistRanchi.

¶15

Page 1 of 2

¶16

Neutral Citation No. 2025:JHHC:33809-DB

¶17

M/s Annai Infra Developers Private Limited through its Director, having its registered office at 2/9 AN Towers, Dr. Sathyamoorthy Hospital, Opposite Road 2/5, Perundurai Road, P.O and P.S Erode, Dist-Erode-638011, State-Tamil Nadu.

¶18

... Respondents

¶19

¶20

CORAM: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR

¶21

¶22

For the Petitioner: Mr. Parth Jalan, Advocate For Resp. Nos.1-6: Mr. Krishna Murari, Advocate For Resp. No.7: Mr. Harsh Preet Singh, Advocate

¶23

¶24

03/Dated: 12.11.2025

¶25

Tarlok Singh Chauhan, C.J. (Oral)

¶26

1. I.A. No.14747 of 2025 has been filed for withdrawal of the aforesaid writ petition.

¶27

2. Obviously, there is no objection to the prayer made in the Interlocutory Application.

¶28

3. Accordingly, this Interlocutory Application is allowed.

¶29

4. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶30

5. All interim orders stand vacated.

¶31

6. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.

¶32

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan, C.J.)

¶33

(Rajesh Shankar, J.)

¶34

November 12, 2025

¶35

N.A.F.R.

¶36

Manoj/Pramanik/Cp.2

¶37

Page 2 of 2

Nalanda Engicon (P) Limited, Representative Mr. Bindeshwari Prasad Singh v. Jharkhand Urban Infrastructure Development Company Limited, through Its Managing Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nalanda Engicon (P) Limited, Representative Mr. Bindeshwari Prasad Singh v. Jharkhand Urban Infrastructure Development Company Limited, through Its Managing Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The State of Jharkhand Thr the Secretary/ Pr. Secretary, Personel, Admin. Reforms N Rajbhasha Dept. Vs Akhilesh Prasad

Md. Arif, the Secretary, Brilliant Education Trust Vs the State of Jharkhand

Banshidhar Construction Pvt. Ltd., through Its Chief Executive Officer, Kanchan Yadav Vs the State of Jharkhand, through the Secretary, Dept. of Mines and Geology

Ms Kashyap Contractors and Developers Pvt. Ltd. through Its Director Santosh Kumar Vs Union of India through the Secretary Ministry of Finance Deptt of Revenue

Ahilya Devi Vs the State of Jharkhand, Represented Thr the Pr. Secretary, Rural Devp. Dept. (Rural Work Affairs)

Bokaro Steel Plant Steel Authority of India Ltd. through Its General Manager Law John Tapan Kongari Vs Inox Air Products Ltd. through Its Managing Director