The petitioner challenged an order under the Jharkhand Public Land Encroachment Act alleging denial of hearing. The State contended that notices were issued, the petitioner filed a written submission, and the Act provides a specific appellate remedy. The Court dismissed the petition with cost.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2025:JHHC:15861
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (C) No. 466 of 2025
Jhupar Das, S/o Late Sadhu Das, R/o Village-Gayatri Nagar, Poraiyahat, P.O. & P.S.-Poraiyahat, Dist.-Godda … …. Petitioner
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY
----For the Petitioner : Mr. N.P. Choudhary, Advocate For the State : Mr. Suraj Prakash, AC to SC-VII -----
Oral Order
10 / Dated : 17.06.2025
Writ petition accordingly, stands dismissed with cost.
(Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J . )
AKT/Satendra
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the authorities violated principles of natural justice by passing the order without giving the petitioner an opportunity of personal hearing.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Jhupar Das
The State of Jharkhand
The Deputy Commissioner, Godda
The Sub-Divisional Officer, Godda
The Circle Officer, Poraiyahat
Gautam Kumar Choudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
