Dismissed¶16

Aditya Kumar v. Union of India Thro the Secretary Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue

Jharkhand HC4 Sept 2025WPC/2040/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Withdrawal of writ petition permitted; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file appeal against final order of competent authority; filing defects (Office note dated 01.09.2025) held ignorable and ignored; no opposition by respondents; I.A. disposed of; no merits adjudicated; High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi; W.P.(T) No. 2040 of 2024; order dated 04.09.2025; Bench: Sujit Narayan Prasad and Arun Kumar Rai, JJ.; petitioner: Aditya Kumar, Director; respondents: Union of India & Ors.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to withdraw the writ petition and approach the alternative forum raising all available points against the final order of the competent authority. ¶16

Aditya Kumar Vs Union of India Thro the Secretary Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue — Jharkhand HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

¶2

W.P.(T) No. 2040 of 2024

¶3

Aditya Kumar, Director … … ... Petitioner Versus

¶4

Union of India & Ors. … … ... Respondents

¶5

…

¶6

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR RAI

¶7

For the Petitioner : Mr. Nitin Kumar Pasari, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. P.A.S. Pati, Sr. S.C.

¶8

…

¶9

Order No.06/dated 04.09.2025

¶10

This matter has been mentioned at 10:30 in pursuance to the administrative order of Hon’ble the Chief Justice that the urgent matters of the Division Bench No. I, comprising of Hon’ble the Chief Justice and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Shankar, if any, may be mentioned before the Division Bench No.II, i.e. this Bench. The mention memo has been allowed with a direction to take up this matter at 01:00 p.m. Accordingly, on being communicated to the Office, the Production Cause List has been notified reflecting the present case for taking it up at 01:00 p.m. Accordingly, the matter has been taken up.

¶11

Mr. Nitin Kumar Pasari, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner in presence of Mr. P.A.S. Pati, Sr. S.C. seeks leave of this Court to withdraw this writ petition, since, the final order has been passed by the competent authority which the petitioner wants to assail by preferring appeal by taking all the available grounds.

¶12

The learned Counsel has further submitted that since the writ petition is sought to be withdrawn and as such the defects may be ignored.

¶13

This Court before granting such leave, has gone through the nature of defects, as has been pointed out by the Office note dated 01.09.2025. The pointed-out defects are ignorable and as such the same are being ignored.

¶14

There is no opposition by learned Counsel appearing for the respondents.

¶15

This Court, on consideration of the submission made on behalf of the petitioner and there is no objection by the learned Counsel appearing for the respondents, is granting leave to withdraw this writ petition with a liberty to approach the alternative forum by raising all the available points.

¶16