Dismissed¶¶18

Sushil Oraon Alias Birbal Oraon Alias Birbal Jee Alias Sushil Jee v. State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC15 Dec 2025W.P.(Cr.)/668/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition (cr.) before Jharkhand High Court at Ranchi (Division Bench: Sujit Narayan Prasad & Arun Kumar Rai, JJ.) concerning detention order / extension of period of detention at Latehar; dismissed as withdrawn on 15.12.2025 as detention period had elapsed, liberty reserved to file fresh writ petition against any fresh or extension order; petitioner Sushil Oraon @ Birbal Oraon; State of Jharkhand unrepresented.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty reserved to the petitioner to challenge any fresh order or extension of the period of detention by filing a fresh writ petition. ¶¶18

Sushil Oraon Alias Birbal Oraon Alias Birbal Jee Alias Sushil Jee Vs State of Jharkhand — Jharkhand HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

( 2025:JHHC:37596-DB )

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

¶3

W.P. (Cr.) D.B. No. 668 of 2025

¶4

Sushil Oraon @ Birbal Oraon @ Birbal Jee @ Sushil Jee, aged 37 years, son of Feku Oraon, resident of Mandhaniya, P.O. and P.S. Manika, District- Latehar. … … Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Jharkhand.

¶7

Deputy Commissioner-cum-District Magistrate, Latehar, P.O. and P.S. Latehar, District-Latehar.

¶8

Superintendent of Police, Latehar having office at Latehar, P.O. and P.S. Latehar, District-Latehar.

¶9

Sub Divisional Police Officer Barwadih, P.O. and P.S. Barwadih, District-Latehar.

¶10

Under Secretary, Home Jail and Disaster Management Department, Government of Jharkhand having office at Project Bhawan Dhurwa, P.O. and P.S. Dhurwa, DistrictRanchi. … … Respondents

¶11

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR RAI

¶12

For the Petitioner : Mr. Ayush Kr. Verma, Advocate For the Resp.-State : None

¶13

… Order No.08/dated 15.12.2025

¶14

Learned Counsel appearing for the writ petitioner, on instruction, has submitted that since the period of detention order has already elapsed and as such, he does not intend to press this writ petition for the present. However, he has sought for liberty to challenge, in a case, if any, further order by way of fresh extension order extending the period of detention if passed liberty may be reserved to challenge the same by filing fresh writ petition.

¶15

There is none to oppose on behalf of the State.

¶16

( 2025:JHHC:37596-DB )

¶17

Considering the submission made on behalf of the writ petitioner, this Court is of the view that the detention order since has lost its force and as such nothing remains to be decided in this writ petition and as such as is being prayed to withdraw the writ petition, such liberty is being granted for withdrawal of the writ petition by reserving liberty to the writ petitioner to challenge the order, if any, passed afresh or extending the period of detention which is the subject matter of the present writ petition.

¶18

Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid observation.

¶19

(Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.)

¶20

15^th December, 2025

¶21

P.K.S./Suman-

¶22

Sushil Oraon Alias Birbal Oraon Alias Birbal Jee Alias Sushil Jee v. State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sushil Oraon Alias Birbal Oraon Alias Birbal Jee Alias Sushil Jee v. State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nisha Saw @ Nisha Gupta Vs Ashish Kumar Banka @ Anni

Md. Javed Akhtar Vs the State of Jharkhand

Faizan Ansari Alias Faiz Vs the Union of India through National Investigation Agency

Rakesh Shukla Vs Putul Devi Upadhyay

Sweta Kumari Vs Prakash Kumar

M/S. Samriddhi Agro Foods Private Limited, Thr. Its Director, Mr. Rishu Chirania Vs M/S. Samriddhi Rice Mill Private Limited, Thr Its Director, Namely, Anand Sekhsaria