Disposed¶20

Ram Udar Goswami v. the State of Jharkhand through Its Secretary Land Revenue Department

Jharkhand HC4 Jul 2025C.M.P./295/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Restoration of writ petition dismissed for non-compliance of peremptory order dated 15.02.2024; proof of deposit of Rs.1,000/- with JHALSA not filed within stipulated time due to mistake of mind; non-compliance neither deliberate nor intentional; no serious objection by opposite parties; W.P. (C) No.3486 of 2017 restored to original file at same stage; Registry to list after a week; C.M.P. No.295 of 2024; Jharkhand High Court; Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary; order dated 04-07-2025; [2025:JHHC:17952].

What did the court decide?

Restoration of W.P. (C) No.3486 of 2017 to its original file at the same stage at which it was before its dismissal, with a direction to the Registry to list it before the concerned Bench after a week. ¶20

Ram Udar Goswami Vs the State of Jharkhand through Its Secretary Land Revenue Department — Jharkhand HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

[2025:JHHC:17952] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.M.P. No.295 of 2024

¶2

Ram Udar Goswami, aged about 48 years, son of Shri Goswami Narendra Nath, resident of Qr. No.2185, Sector-XII/E, Bokaro Steel City, P.O. and P.S. Sector-XII, Bokaro Steel City, District Bokaro, Jharkhand … Petitioner

¶3

Versus

¶4

The State of Jharkhand through its Secretary, Land Revenue Department, Project Bhawan, P.O. and P.S. Dhurwa (Hatia), District Ranchi, Jharkhand.

¶5

The Deputy Commissioner, Bokaro Camp-II, Bokaro Steel City, P.O. and P.S. Sector-I, Bokaro Steel City, District Bokaro (Jharkhand)

¶6

The Sub-Divisional Officer, Chas, I.T.I. More, P.O. and P.S. Chas, District Bokaro (Jharkhand)

¶7

The Divisional Forest Officer (Sri. P.R. Nayadu), Bokaro Forest Divisional Office, Bokaro, situated at Kamaldih, Chas Purulia Road, P.O. and P.S. Chas, District Bokaro

¶8

The Officer In-charge of Sector-XII P.S., Bokaro Steel City, P.O. and P.S. Sector-XII, Bokaro Steel City, District Bokaro

¶9

… Opposite Parties

¶10

-----CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

¶11

For the Petitioner : Mr. Rama Kant Tiwari, Advocate For the Opp. Parties : Mr. Jayant Franklin Toppo, GA V Ms. Moushmi Chatterjee, AC to GA V

¶12

------

¶13

Order No:-04 Dated:-04-07-2025

¶14

Heard the parties.

¶15

This civil miscellaneous petition has been filed by the petitioner with a prayer for restoration of W.P. (C) No.3486 of 2017 to its original file, which stood dismissed for non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 15.02.2024 passed by this Court.

¶16

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that W.P. (C) No.3486 of 2017 stood dismissed for non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 15.02.2024 passed by this Court to file the proof of deposit of Rs.1,000/- by the petitioner with the Jharkhand State Legal Services Authority (JHALSA). It is next submitted that by mistake of mind, the said proof of deposit of Rs.1,000/- by the petitioner with the Jharkhand State Legal Services Authority (JHALSA) could not be filed within the stipulated time; which resulted in dismissal of the said W.P. (C) No.3486 of 2017 for non-compliance of the said peremptory order dated 15.02.2024 passed by this Court. It is next submitted that non-compliance of the said peremptory order dated 15.02.2024 was neither deliberate nor intentional. It is also submitted that the petitioner has very good grounds to agitate in the said W.P. (C) No.3486 of 2017 and unless the same is restored to its original file, the petitioner will be highly prejudiced. Hence, it is submitted that the W.P. (C) No.3486 of 2017 be restored to its original file.

¶17

Learned counsel for the opposite parties have not raised any serious objection.

¶18

Considering the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, W.P. (C) No.3486 of 2017 is directed to be restored to its original file at the same stage at which it was before its dismissal.

¶19

Registry is directed to list W.P. (C) No.3486 of 2017 before the concerned Bench after a week.

¶20

This civil miscellaneous petition is disposed of accordingly.

¶21

(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J . )

¶22

Animesh/

Ram Udar Goswami v. the State of Jharkhand through Its Secretary Land Revenue Department

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ram Udar Goswami v. the State of Jharkhand through Its Secretary Land Revenue Department

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Amit Raj Vs the State of Jharkhand

Manoj Kumar Sinha Vs the State of Jharkhand

Ganesh Prasad Singh Vs The State Of Jharkhand

Gopal Chandra Roy Vs the State of Jharkhand

Anil Mahto Alias Anil Kumar Vs the State of Jharkhand

Mahfuj Alam Vs the State of Jharkhand