Disposed¶20

Ramanuj Prasad v. the State of Jharkhand through the Deputy Commissioner

Jharkhand HC8 Aug 2024WPC/966/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Dhanbad land records; online rent receipt; acceptance of rent; continuous khatiyan correction; Section 87 Chotanagpur Tenancy Act; order dated 13.10.2009 in Case No.264/2007; Revenue Officer cum Survey Settlement Officer Dhanbad; Circle Officer Baghmara; Deputy Commissioner Dhanbad; fresh representation; decision in accordance with law within four weeks; writ petition disposed.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the petitioner to file a fresh representation before the Circle Officer, Baghmara, District-Dhanbad within two weeks, with the Circle Officer to take a decision in accordance with law within a further period of four weeks thereafter. ¶20

Ramanuj Prasad Vs the State of Jharkhand through the Deputy Commissioner — Jharkhand HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

¶2

W.P. (C) No. 966 of 2024

¶3

Ramanuj Prasad, S/o Late Yamuna Prasad Sonar @ Yamuna Sonar, aged about 61 years, R/o C/o Tetulmari, Near Hanuman Mandir, Chandor Basti, P.O. & P.S. Chhotanagari, Dist.- Dhanbad

¶4

… Petitioner

¶5

-Versus-

¶6

The State of Jharkhand through the Deputy Commissioner, Dhanbad, P.O., P.S. & District- Dhanbad

¶7

Revenue Officer cum Survey Settlement Officer, Dhanbad, P.O., P.S. & District- Dhanbad

¶8

Land Reforms Deputy Collector, Dhanbad, P.O., P.S. & DistrictDhanbad

¶9

Circle Officer, Baghmara, P.O. & P.S. Baghmara, District- Dhanbad

¶10

… Respondents

¶11

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI

¶12

For the Petitioner : Mrs. Rishi Bharti, Advocate For the State : Mr. Anish Kumar Mishra, A.C. to Sr. S.C.-I

¶13

04/08.08.2024 Heard Mrs. Rishi Bharti, learned counsel for the petitioner and

¶14

Mr. Anish Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the State.

¶15

The prayer in the writ petition is made for direction upon the respondents to accept the rent and issue online rent receipt in view of the fact that by order dated 13.10.2009 passed in Case No.264/2007, the Revenue Officer cum Survey Settlement Officer, Dhanbad has corrected the continuous khatiyan under Section 87 of the Chotanagpur Tenancy Act by entering the name of the petitioner and his brothers.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has moved before the Circle Officer, Baghmara, District- Dhanbad and the Deputy Commissioner, Dhanbad for issuance of online receipts with respect to the property in question, however, no decision has yet been taken.

¶17

-1- W.P. (C) No. 966 of 2024

¶18

Learned counsel for the State submits that the petitioner may move before the Circle Officer, Baghmara, District- Dhanbad, who will pass appropriate order.

¶19

In view of the above, this writ petition is being disposed of with direction to the petitioner to file a fresh representation before the Circle Officer, Baghmara, District- Dhanbad within two weeks and after receiving the same, the Circle Officer, Baghmara, District- Dhanbad will take a decision, in accordance with law within further period of four weeks thereafter.

¶20

Accordingly, this petition is disposed of.

¶21

(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)

¶22

Ajay/

¶23

-2- W.P. (C) No. 966 of 2024

Ramanuj Prasad v. the State of Jharkhand through the Deputy Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramanuj Prasad v. the State of Jharkhand through the Deputy Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajesh Oraon Vs the State of Jharkhand

Naresh Prasad Vs the State of Jharkhand

Ganga Devi Vs the State of Jharkhand

Purushottam Lal Tibrewal Vs the State of Jharkhand through Its Chief Secretary

Nawal Kishore Verma Vs the State of Jharkhand through the Deputy Commissioner

Laxmi Hasda Vs the State of Jharkhand through Chief Secretary