Petitioners sought enhancement of land acquisition compensation for land in Udhwa acquired for a national highway; the arbitrator had rejected their claim. The High Court disposed of the writ petition with liberty to pursue remedies in accordance with law.
Liberty to the petitioners to work out their remedy in accordance with law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P.(C) No.82 of 2022
… … …Petitioner(s) -Versus-
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR
--For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. D.D. Saha, Adv. For the State : Mr. Rohit, A.C. to AAG-I For the NHAI : Ms. S. Topno, Adv. ---
06/11.09.2024: Heard the parties.
acquired and accordingly, award has been prepared.
enhancement of the compensation amount has been rejected by the Arbitrator, Sahibganj under Section 3(G) of the National Highways Authority of India Act, 1956.
(Rajesh Kumar, J.)
Ravi/Uploaded
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition is maintainable when the arbitrator under Section 3(G) of the NHAI Act has already rejected the claim for enhanced compensation.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Md. Firoz Alam
Tarannum Shamim
The State of Jharkhand
The Deputy Commissioner, Sahibganj
The Land Acquisition Officer, Sahibganj
The Circle Officer, Udhwa
Rajesh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
