Sunaina Devi v. Sarju Singh
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition concerning a property dispute was dismissed for non-prosecution after counsel reported that the client had taken no objection and he had no further instructions.
Writ petition concerning a property dispute was dismissed for non-prosecution after counsel reported that the client had taken no objection and he had no further instructions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P. (C) No. 2150 of 2018
... ... ... Petitioners
Versus
Residents of village Khagradih, P.O. & P.S Birni, District-Giridih
... … Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR
For the Petitioners: Mr. Bhaiya V. Kumar, Advocate Mr. Avishek Chandra, Advocate For the Respondents: Mr. Yogesh Modi, Advocate
21/Dated: 11.09.2024
(Rajesh Kumar, J.)
VK
Uploaded
2 W.P. (C) No. 2150 of 2018
Sunaina Devi
Rabindra Rai @ Rabindra Prasad Rai
Sarju Singh
Shankar Manjhi
Muna Hasda
Sushil Hasda
Rajesh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court