A 2004 writ petition was dismissed for default because neither the petitioner nor counsel appeared on the date of hearing; no merits were considered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 6184 of 2004
------
Bishu Mahto .... .... …. Petitioner
Versus
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY
For the Petitioner : None For the State : Mr. Prashant Kumar Rai, AC to SC (L&C)-I ------
Order No.07 / Dated : 09.04.2024
No one appears on behalf of petitioner.
From perusal of record, it appears that earlier on 06.04.2021 no one
had appeared.
Under the circumstance, instant writ petition is dismissed for default
on account of non-appearance.
(Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J . )
Anit
Bishu Mahto
State of Jharkhand
Commissioner, North Chhotanagpur Division, Hazaribag
Additional Collector, Hazaribag
Land Reforms Deputy Collector, Hazaribag
Chhedi Mahto
Gautam Kumar Choudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
