Writ petition dismissed for default as the petitioner failed to appear and prosecute the case; no adjudication on any issue.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (C) No. 2764 of 2010
Sandeep Kumar
Petitioner
Versus
… …. Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY
For the Petitioner : None For the UOI : Mr. Anil Kumar, ASGI For the SBI : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate
Oral Order
05 / Dated : 09.04.2024
None appeared on behalf of the petitioner.
From perusal of the earlier order dated 19.03.2024, it appears that none had
appeared on behalf of the petitioner before this Court and the same is the fate today. It appears that the petitioner has lost his interest in the case and it will be no purpose
for granting further adjournment.
Accordingly, writ petition stands dismissed for default on account of nonprosecution.
(Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J.)
AKT/Satendra
Uploaded
Sandeep Kumar
The Union of India through Secretary, Department of Finance, Govt. of India, New Delhi
The Recovery Officer, Debt Recovery Tribunal, Ranchi
State Bank of India through its Branch Manager, Daltonganj Branch
Ramakant Singh
Anand Kumar Singh
Gautam Kumar Choudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
