Dismissed¶23

Bijay Kumar Jha v. the Union of India through Its Secretary Department of Coal Union of India

Jharkhand HC16 Oct 2024WPC/618/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

PIL dismissed as withdrawn: Bijay Kumar Jha v. Union of India & 11 others, W.P. (PIL) No. 618 of 2022, High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi, decided 16.10.2024 by M. S. Ramachandra Rao, C.J. and Deepak Roshan, J. Petitioner (Dhanbad) withdrew the PIL after arguments with the Court's permission; respondents included coal-sector authorities (Coal India Ltd., BCCL, ECL), CISF, State of Jharkhand, SSP Dhanbad, DG Mines Safety and CBI. No merits adjudicated; useful only as a withdrawal/dismissal-as-withdrawn order.

What did the court decide?

Permission granted to learned counsel for the petitioner to withdraw W.P.(PIL) No. 618 of 2022; the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn. ¶23

Bijay Kumar Jha Vs the Union of India through Its Secretary Department of Coal Union of India — Jharkhand HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

¶2

W.P. (PIL) No. 618 of 2022

¶3

Bijay Kumar Jha, aged about 68 years, S/o-Late Rudra Nan Jha, R/o-Near Krishna Mantri Sadan, Bose Colony, Rani Bazar, P.O. & P.S.-Katras, District-Dhanbad, Jharkhand ... ... ... ... ... ... Petitioner

¶4

Versus

¶5

The Union of India through its Secretary Department of Coal Union of India, Shastri Bhawan, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Road, P.O. & P.S.-Sansad Marg, DistrictNew Delhi.

¶6

The Director General, Central Industrial Security Force, Coal Union of India, Shastri Bhawan, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Road, P.O. & P.S.-Sansad Marg, DistrictNew Delhi.

¶7

The Chief Vigilance Officer Coal India Limited, 4.M.A.R., AF-III action Area-IA, New Town, Rajarhat, P.O. & P.S.-Rajarhat, District-Kolkata-56.

¶8

The In-Charge Watch & Ward Bharat Coking Coal Limited, Koyla Bhawan, Dhanbad, P.O., P.S.-Koyla Nagar, District-Dhanbad, Jharkhand.

¶9

The Chairman, Coal India Limited, having his office at Coal Bhawan, 10 Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose Road, P.O. & P.S.-Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose Road, District-Kolkata, West Bengal.

¶10

The Chairman Cum Managing Director, Bharat Coking Coal Limited, having his office at Koyla Bhawan, Dhanbad, P.O., P.S.-Koyla Nagar, District- Dhanbad, Jharkhand.

¶11

The Director Inspector General (DIG) (Commandant), Central Industrial Security Force (CISF), Dhanbad, P.O., P.S. & District-Dhanbad, Jharkhand.

¶12

The State of Jharkhand.

¶13

The Senior Superintendent of Police, Dhanbad, P.O., P.S. & District-Dhanbad, Jharkhand.

¶14

The Director General Mines Safety, Dhanbad, P.O. & P.S.-Saraidhela, DistrictDhanbad, Jharkhand.

¶15

The Director, Central Bureau of Investigation, 6^th Floor, Lodhi Road, Plot No.5/B, Jawaharlal Nehru Stadium Marg, CGO Complex, P.O. & P.S.-Lodhi Road, District-New Delhi, Delhi-110003.

¶16

The Chairman cum Managing Director, the Eastern Coalfields Ltd. P.O. Dishergarh, Dist. Burdwan, West Bengal, PIN-713333

¶17

… … ... Respondents

¶18

CORAM: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN

¶19

For the Petitioner:	--------- Mr. Rajeev Kumar, Advocate
For the UOI:	Mr. Prashant Pallav, Dy.SGI
For the State:	Mr. Piyush Chitresh, A.C. to A.G.
For the BCCL:	Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Advocate
For the ECL:	Mr. Rajesh Lala, Advocate ---------

¶20

12/Dated: 16.10.2024

¶21

After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this W.P.(PIL).

¶22

Permitted to do so.

¶23

This W.P.(PIL) is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶24

(M. S. Ramachandra Rao, C.J.)

¶25

(Deepak Roshan, J.)

¶26

APK/VK

Bijay Kumar Jha v. the Union of India through Its Secretary Department of Coal Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bijay Kumar Jha v. the Union of India through Its Secretary Department of Coal Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Niwas Kumar Ray Vs State of Jharkhand through the Chief Secretary

Jis Industrial Training Company Pvt. Ltd. Thro Its Authorized Signatory Samir Narayan Roy Vs the State of Jharkhand

M/S Mandhan Minerals Corporation Thro Its Partner Namely Anil Kumar Tanwani Vs the State of Jharkhand through the Secretary Department of Industries Mines and Geology

Srimati Bhagya Mandal Vs the State of Jharkhand through the Commissioner, Singhbhum (Kolhan) Sub-Division, Chaibasa

M/S Jain Trading Corporation through Its Partner Pratap Jain Vs the State of Jharkhand

M/S Green Power System Represented by Its Authorised Person Ashok Kumar Verma Vs the State of Jharkhand Represented by Its Chief Secretary