Dismissed¶37

Niwas Kumar Ray v. State of Jharkhand through the Chief Secretary

Jharkhand HC15 Oct 2024WPC/523/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Withdrawal permitted; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn. Bench: M.S. Ramachandra Rao (C.J.) and Deepak Roshan (J.); decision date 15.10.2024; case W.P. (S) No. 523 of 2024; petitioners (17 named individuals) vs State of Jharkhand and Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission (JSSC); petitioners' advocates J.N. Upadhyay and Rahul Kumar; State advocate Sachin Kumar (A.A.G.-II); JSSC advocates Sanjoy Piprawall, Prince Kumar, Rakesh Ranjan. No statutes cited, no precedents cited, no monetary amounts.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the writ petition granted; the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn. ¶37

Niwas Kumar Ray Vs State of Jharkhand through the Chief Secretary — Jharkhand HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

¶2

W.P. (S) No. 523 of 2024

¶3

Niwas Kumar Ray, aged about 34 years, son of Gupteshwar Ray, resident of Garamnala Security Flat H-22, Bistupur, P.O. and P.S. Bistupur, District-East Singhbhum.

¶4

Lav Kumar, aged about 35 years, son of Awdhesh Rai, resident of H. No. H/1, Near Shiv Mandir, Garamnala Security Flat, P.O. and P.S. Bistupur, District East Singhbhum

¶5

Rahul Prakash, aged about 35 years, son of Gupteshwar Ray, resident of Bhola Bagan, Road No. 2, Chota Govindpur, P.O. and P.S. Govindpur, District-East Singhbhum

¶6

Dipak Kumar Bhatt, aged about 37 years, son of Krishna Bihari Bhatt, resident of H. No. 3, Bhuiyadih, Nand Nagar, P.O. and P.S. Agrico, District-East Singhbhum

¶7

Santosh Kumar Singh, aged about 34 years, son of Baliram Singh, resident of Qr. No. 8/4, Camp1, Bokaro Steel City, Bokaro, P.O. and P.S. B.S. City, District-Bokaro.

¶8

Shree Krishna Singh, aged about 39 years, son of Satrughan Singh, resident of Gwalapatti, Kitadih, P.O. Kitadih, P.S. Bagbera, Town Jamshedpur, District-East Singhbhum

¶9

Mantosh Kumar Gond, aged about 35 years, son of Dashai Prasad Gond, resident of Gaon Birpur, P.O. Nachap, P.S. Murar, District-Buxar, Bihar.

¶10

Sanjay Kumar, aged about 39 years, son of Bhola Ram, resident of Ambedkar Nagar, Sector 1/B, P.S. City Thana, P.O. Bokaro, DistrictEast Singhbhum

¶11

Bimlesh Kumar Ray, aged about 35 years, son of Ramdev Ray, resident of Dev Nagar, Bajrang Path, P.O. Sakchi, P.S. Sitaramdera, Town Jamshedpur, District-East Singhbhum

¶12

Devendra Dubey, aged about 35 years, son of Bacchu Dubey, resident of Ward No. 11, Village Banpurwa, P.O. Tildag, P.S. Garhwa, DistrictGarhwa

¶13

Ajit Kumar Singh, aged about 39 years, son of Kanhaiya Singh, resident of Bajrang Tekri, Near Hanuman Mandir, Jamshedpur, P.O. and P.S. Bagbera, District, East Singhbhum.

¶14

Chandra Mani Choubey, aged about 35 years, son of Bipin Bihari Choubey, resident of Shiv Mandir, Bagbera, P.O. and P.S. Bagbera, District-East Singhbhum

¶15

Kishan Kumar, aged about 35 years, son of Kapil Dev Ram, resident of H. No. 33, Harhar Guttu, P.O. Harhar Guttu, P.S. Bagbera, District-East Singhbhum

¶16

Angad Tiwary, aged about 36 years, son of Mahavir Tiwary, resident of Holding No. 99, Zone No. 5 Birsanagar, P.O. and P.S. Birsanagar, District-East Singhbhum

¶17

Hari Shankar Mishra, aged about 37 years, son of Paramhans Mishra, resident of H. No. 39, Line No. 3, Near Kali Mandir, Namda Basti, Adarsh Colony, Jamshedpur, P.O. and P.S. Golmuri, District-East Singhbhum

¶18

-2-

¶19

Arun Kumar, aged about 35 years, son of Dashrath Shahu, resident of Gadra, Near Vikash Bhawan, P.O. Gadra, P.S. Parsudih, District-East Singhbhum

¶20

Dilip Kumar Behara, aged about 37 years, son of Ravi Narayan Behara, resident of 671, Sambhalpuria Basti, Khuntadih, P.O. and P.S. Sonari, District-East Singhbhum

¶21

... ... ... Petitioners

¶22

Versus

¶23

State of Jharkhand through the Chief Secretary, Government of Jharkhand having its office at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. and P.S. Dhurwa, Town and District-Ranchi

¶24

The Principal Secretary, Department of Home, having its office at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. and P.S. Dhurwa, Town and District-Ranchi

¶25

The Director General of Police, Jharkhand, having its office at Police Headquarter, at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. and P.S. Dhurwa, Town and District-Ranchi

¶26

The Director General, Home Guard, having its office at Rajendra Chowk, P.O. and P.S. Doranda, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand

¶27

Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission through its Chairman, having its office at Kalinagar, Chaibagan, Namkom, P.O. and P.S. Namkom, Town and District-Ranchi

¶28

The Secretary, Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission having its office at Kalinagar, Chaibagan, Namkom, P.O. and P.S. Namkom, Town and District-Ranchi

¶29

The Controller of Examination, Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission having its office at Kalinagar, Chaibagan, Namkom, P.O. and P.S. Namkom, Town and District-Ranchi

¶30

… … ... Respondents

¶31

--------- CORAM: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN

¶32

--------For the Petitioners: Mr. J.N. Upadhyay, Advocate Mr. Rahul Kumar, Advocate For the State: Mr. Sachin Kumar, A.A.G.-II For the JSSC: Mr. Sanjoy Piprawall, Advocate Mr. Prince Kumar, Advocate Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, Advocate ---------

¶33

05/Dated: 15.10.2024

¶34

1) Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this

¶35

writ petition.

¶36

2) Permitted to do so.

¶37

3) This writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶38

(M.S. Ramachandra Rao, C.J.)

¶39

(Deepak Roshan, J.)

¶40

Manoj/MM/Cp.1

Niwas Kumar Ray v. State of Jharkhand through the Chief Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Niwas Kumar Ray v. State of Jharkhand through the Chief Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dr Sunil Kumar Singh and Anr. Vs Union of India through Secretary Department of Personnel and Training and Ors.

Arun Kumar Tiwari Vs the State of Jharkhand

Poonam Lakra Vs the State of Jharkhand

Jis Industrial Training Company Pvt. Ltd. Thro Its Authorized Signatory Samir Narayan Roy Vs the State of Jharkhand

M/S Mandhan Minerals Corporation Thro Its Partner Namely Anil Kumar Tanwani Vs the State of Jharkhand through the Secretary Department of Industries Mines and Geology

M/S Akhileshwar Singh Represented Thro Its Proprietor Akhileshwar Singh Vs the State of Jharkhand