The writ petition was withdrawn by the petitioner as it had become infructuous. The Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI WP (C) No. 537 of 2016
Sutapa Sarangi … Petitioner Versus … Dr. Debajyoti Sarangi Respondent
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
For the Petitioner : Mr. I.Sinha , Adv. For the Respondent : Mr. C.Mukherjee , Adv.
07 / 11.06.2024 Heard the parties.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this writ petition has become infructuous and seeks permission of the court to withdraw the writ petition.
Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.)
Smita/-
Sutapa Sarangi
Dr. Debajyoti Sarangi
Anil Kumar Choudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
