Writ petitions by two companies against the State of Jharkhand were dismissed for non-prosecution as no one appeared for the petitioners despite repeated calls.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (L). No.3314 of 2021
------
M/s Indian Steel & Wire Products Limited
.... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & Others ..... .... .... Respondents With W.P. (L). No.3315 of 2021 ------ M/S Jemco Ltd. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & Others ..... .... .... Respondents With W.P. (L). No.1173 of 2022
------
M/s Indian Steel & Wire Products Limited
.... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & Others ..... .... .... Respondents With W.P. (L). No.1189 of 2022 ------ M/S Jemco Ltd. .... .... …. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand & Others ..... .... .... Respondents
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
For the Petitioners : No For the Respondents : Mr. Ashutosh Anand, AAG III ------
Order No:-09 Dated:-11-06-2024
Heard the learned counsel for the respondents.
No one turns up on behalf of petitioners in spite of repeated calls.
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that since there is no merit in these writ petitions, hence, the petitioners are not diligent in prosecuting these writ petitions.
Accordingly, these writ petitions stand dismissed for nonprosecution.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J . )
Animesh/
M/s Indian Steel & Wire Products Limited
M/s Jemco Ltd.
The State of Jharkhand
Anil Kumar Choudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
