Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner did not appear despite repeated calls; respondents' counsel argued lack of merit and diligence.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C). No.5328 of 2017
------
Sri Virendra Prasad Mehta .... .... …. Petitioner
Versus
The Chairman, Jharkhand Academic Council, Ranchi & Others .... .... .... Respondents
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
For the Petitioner : None For the Respondents : Ms. Richa Sanchita, Advocate Ms. Rishita Singh, Advocate
Order No:-04 Dated:-12-01-2024
Heard the learned counsel appearing for the respondents. No one turns up on behalf of the petitioner in spite of repeated calls. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that since there is no merit in this W.P. (C), hence, the petitioner is not diligent in prosecuting this W.P. (C).
Accordingly, this W.P. (C) stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J . )
Animesh/
Sri Virendra Prasad Mehta
The Chairman, Jharkhand Academic Council, Ranchi
Anil Kumar Choudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
