Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution as no one appeared for the petitioner despite repeated calls; respondents contended the petitioner was not diligent and the petition lacked merit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 4973 of 2017
------
Gopinath Singh Jansewa Sansthan
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand & Ors. .... .... .... Respondents
------
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
For the Petitioner : None For the Respondents : Mr. Sreenu Garapati, SC-III : Mrs. Richa Sanchita, Advocate
------
Order No.09 Dated- 11.01.2024
No one turns up on behalf of the petitioner in-spite of repeated calls.
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the petitioner is not diligent in prosecuting this writ petition as there is no merit in this writ petition.
Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed for nonprosecution.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J . )
Sonu/Gunjan-
Gopinath Singh Jansewa Sansthan
The State of Jharkhand
Anil Kumar Choudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
