Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution as petitioners failed to appear despite repeated calls; only State counsel was present.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C). No.4722 of 2017
------
Dr. Narendra Kumar & Another .... .... …. Petitioners
Versus
The State of Jharkhand & Others .... .... .... Respondents
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
For the Petitioners : None
For the Respondents : Ms. Laxmi Murmu, GP I Ms. Amrita Banerjee, AC to GP I
Order No:-06 Dated:-11-01-2024
Heard the learned counsel appearing for the respondent- State. No one turns up on behalf of the petitioners in spite of repeated
calls.
Learned counsel for the respondent- State submits that since there is no merit in this W.P. (C), hence, the petitioners are not diligent in prosecuting this W.P. (C).
Accordingly, this W.P. (C) stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J . )
Animesh/
Dr. Narendra Kumar & Another
The State of Jharkhand
Anil Kumar Choudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
