Shyamlal Sahu v. State of Jharkhand And Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed the writ petition as abated since the sole petitioner died and the legal heirs expressed no interest in pursuing the matter.
The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed the writ petition as abated since the sole petitioner died and the legal heirs expressed no interest in pursuing the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 4799 of 2006
------
Shyamlal Sahu @ Shayam Lal Prasad
.... .... …. Petitioner
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY
For the Petitioner : Mr. Arun Kumar Dey, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Shahi, A.C. to S.C. (L&C)-I ------
Order No.05 / Dated : 19.03.2024
Learned counsel on behalf of petitioner submits that the sole petitioner had died and the legal heirs are not interested to pursue the matter.
Under the circumstance, instant writ petition stands dismissed as
abated.
(Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J . )
Anit
Shyamlal Sahu @ Shayam Lal Prasad
The State of Jharkhand
Member, Board of Revenue, Jharkhand, Ranchi
Additional Collector, Gumla
Land Reforms Deputy Collector, Gumla
Ram Jiwan Prasad Sahu
Gautam Kumar Choudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court