A writ petition concerning excise matters was dismissed as not pressed after the petitioner's counsel stated he had no further instruction and could not pursue the matter. The dismissal was at this stage only.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W. P. (C) No. 4732 of 2011
Narang Distillery Limited, Dhanbad through its Finance Manager Manoj Agarwal … …. Petitioner
Versus
… …. Respondents -----
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY
----For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate For the State : AC to SC-I -----
Oral Order
03 / Dated : 09.01.2024
Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that he has not received any
further instruction from the petitioner and, therefore, he is not in a position to pursue
this matter.
Under the circumstance, this writ petition is dismissed as not pressed, at this stage.
(Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J.)
AKT/Satendra
Uploaded
Narang Distillery Limited, Dhanbad through its Finance Manager Manoj Agarwal
State of Jharkhand through the Secretary, Department of Excise and Prohibition, Ranchi
Commissioner of Excise, Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi
Assistant Commissioner of Excise, Dhanbad
Gautam Kumar Choudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
