Writ petition dismissed for default as neither party appeared and the petitioner showed no interest in prosecuting the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W. P. (C) No. 6251 of 2004
Smt. Meera Devi … …. Petitioner
Versus 1. Abinash Kumar 2. Anil Kumar … …. Respondents ----- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY ----For the Petitioner : None For the Respondents : -----
Oral Order
10 / Dated : 08.01.2024
None appeared on behalf of the petitioner.
From perusal of the earlier order dated 01.02.2023, it appears that none had appeared on behalf of the parties before this Court and the same is the fate today. It appears that the petitioner has lost his interest in the case and it will no purpose for granting further adjournment.
Accordingly, writ petition stands dismissed for default on account of nonprosecution.
(Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J.)
AKT/Satendra
Uploaded
Smt. Meera Devi
Abinash Kumar
Anil Kumar
Gautam Kumar Choudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
