Writ petition called on; no one appeared for the petitioner despite repeated calls, and the High Court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P. (C) No. 3284 of 2017
Gajendra Bahadur .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & Ors. .... .... .... Respondents
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------ For the Petitioner : None For the Respondents : Mr. A.K. Geasen, AC to AAG IA ------
Order No.07 Dated- 09.01.2024
No one turns up on behalf of the petitioner in-spite of repeated calls.
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the petitioner is not diligent in prosecuting this writ petition as there is no merit in this writ petition.
Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed for nonprosecution.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J . )
Sonu/Gunjan-
Gajendra Bahadur
The State of Jharkhand & Ors.
Anil Kumar Choudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
