The petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition. The Court granted permission, and the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P. (C) No. 3256 of 2017
Nitish Kumar Singh .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & Ors. .... .... .... Respondents
------
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Sidhartha Roy, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Mrinal Kanti Roy, GA-I : Mr. Sanjay Piprawall, Advocate : Mr. Prince Kumar, Advocate
------
Order No.09 Dated- 09.01.2024
Heard the parties.
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to
withdraw this writ petition.
Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J . )
Sonu/Gunjan-
Nitish Kumar Singh
The State of Jharkhand
Anil Kumar Choudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
