The single judge dismissed the writ petition for non-prosecution as the petitioners failed to appear in court despite repeated summons and response counsel argued lack of merit.
Petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 1413 of 2019
Manju Singh & Ors. … Petitioner s Versus The State of Jharkhand & Ors. … Respondents ------
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
For the Petitioner s : None For the Respondents : Mr. A.K. Sahani, Advocate ------
Order No.08 Dated- 27.06.2024
No one turns up on behalf of the petitioners in-spite of repeated calls.
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the petitioners are not diligent in prosecuting this writ petition as there is no merit in this writ petition.
Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed for nonprosecution.
Sonu/Gunjan-
Manju Singh & Ors.
The State of Jharkhand & Ors.
ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
