Criminal miscellaneous petition dismissed for non-prosecution as no one appeared for the petitioner despite repeated calls; the State and opposite party no. 2 argued lack of diligence and merit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr.M.P. No. 885 of 2022
Gopal Prasad @ Gopal Prasad Soni
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand & Anr. .... .... .... Opp. Parties
------
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
For the Petitioner : None For the State : Mrs. Vandana Bharti, Addl. P.P. For O.P. No.2 : Mr. Pankaj Srivastava, Advocate
------
Order No.06 Dated- 26.06.2024
No one turns up on behalf of the petitioner in-spite of repeated calls.
Learned Addl. P.P. and the learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 submits that the petitioner is not diligent in prosecuting this criminal miscellaneous petition as there is no merit in this criminal miscellaneous petition.
Accordingly, this criminal miscellaneous petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J . )
Sonu/Gunjan-
Gopal Prasad @ Gopal Prasad Soni
The State of Jharkhand
Anr.
Anil Kumar Choudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
