Revision petition challenged an ex-parte maintenance order awarding Rs.7,000 per month to the wife, with arrears payable in 50 installments, contending no opportunity to defend. The court found maintenance justified given the petitioner's salary of Rs.50,000 as a CRPF Hawaldar and dismissed the revision.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr. Rev. No. 308 of 2021
Mitlal Kisku
… …. Petitioner
Versus
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY ----For the Petitioner : Ms. Vani Kumari, Advocate For the State : Mr. B. Shashtri, A.P.P. -----
Oral Order
09 / Dated : 20.06.2024
AKT/Satayendra
(Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J . )
Uploaded
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the ex-parte maintenance order of Rs.7,000 per month against the petitioner was sustainable.
Mitlal Kisku
The State of Jharkhand
Baha Murmu
Manish Kisku
Gautam Kumar Choudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
