Appellants in a criminal appeal sought leave to withdraw the appeal on instruction of counsel. The High Court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn and disposed of it, with no adjudication on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal (D.B.) No. 215 of 2024
1.Bagan Hembrom 2.Babay Hembrom … … Appellants Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR RAI
For the Appellants : Mr. Onkar Nath Tewary, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Bhola Nath Ojha, A.P.P
Order No. 02 : Dated 14th March, 2024
1. Learned counsel for the appellants, on instruction,
seeks leave of this withdraw the instant appeal.
2. Such submission has been made in presence of learned
Addl. Public Prosecutor.
3. Accordingly, the instant petition stands dismissed as
withdrawn and stands disposed of.
(Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.)
(Arun Kumar Rai, J.)
Alankar/
Bagan Hembrom
Babay Hembrom
The State of Jharkhand
Sujit Narayan Prasad
Arun Kumar Rai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
