Writ petition filed by the petitioner against Union of India (NIA) and State of Jharkhand respondents; counsel sought leave to withdraw as the grievance lost its force; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (Cr.) (HB) No. 98 of 2024
-----
Prmila Devi
..… … Petitioner
Versus
CORAM:HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR RAI
For the Petitioner : Mr. Niranjan Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Aditya Raman, AC to GA – III For the NIA : Mr. Amit Kumar Das, Advocate
Order No. 04 / Dated 13th March, 2024
1. Mr. Niranjan Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the appellant, after some arguments, seeks leave of this Court to withdraw this writ petition since the grievance as has been agitated has lost its force.
2. Such submission has been made in presence of Mr. Amit Kumar Das, learned counsel appearing for the NIA and Mr. Aditya Raman, learned AC to GA – III appearing for the State of Jharkhand.
2
3. In view of submissions made on behalf of the
petitioner, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.)
(Arun Kumar Rai, J.)
Umesh/
Prmila Devi
Union of India, through National Investigation Agency
The State of Jharkhand through Principal Secretary, Home Department
The State of Jharkhand through the Home Secretary
The Director General of Police, Jharkhand
The Senior Superintendent of Police, Ranchi
Sujit Narayan Prasad
Arun Kumar Rai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
