Petition dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner's counsel, with liberty to ignore defects; no substantive ruling of general application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI W.P. (Cr.) No. 386 of 2023
----
Arun Kumar Singh .... Petitioner
-- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand & Ors. .... Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --For the Petitioner :- Mr. Anjani Kumar, Advocate For the State :- Mr. Vineet Kumar Vashistha, Spl. P.P. ----
05 /08.07.2024 Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that so far
court fee is concerned, he will deposit the same in the course of the day.
He submits that the rest of the defects may kindly be ignored. He further
seeks permission to withdraw the petition.
2. Learned counsel for the State has got no serious objection.
3. Accordingly, this petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)
Sangam/
--1--
Arun Kumar Singh
The State of Jharkhand
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
