Petitioners sought permission to withdraw a criminal miscellaneous petition after a final form was submitted and they were not sent up for trial. The High Court permitted withdrawal and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr.M.P. No. 21 of 2023
Robin Kumar Roy & Ors. .... .... …. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand & Anr. .... .... .... Opp. Parties
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Prashant Pallav, Advocate : Mr. Parth Jalan, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Nehala Sharmin, Spl. P.P. ------
Order No.05 Dated- 24.06.2024
Heard the parties.
The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this criminal miscellaneous petition in view of the fact that final form has been submitted and the petitioners have not been sent up for trial.
Accordingly, this criminal miscellaneous petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sonu/Gunjan-
Robin Kumar Roy & Ors.
The State of Jharkhand
Anr.
Anil Kumar Choudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
