Anticipatory bail application in a case under Sections 341, 324, 307, 379, 386 and 506 IPC arising from an FIR alleging assault with a rod. The court noted the victim's injuries and 8-9 days' hospitalisation and rejected the prayer for anticipatory bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A. No. 643 of 2024
Uttam Rai … Petitioner
-Versus-
The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
For the Petitioner : Mr. A.K. Sahani, Advocate For the State : Ms. Bandana Sinha, A.P.P. For the Informant : Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate
05/23.04.2024 Heard Mr. A.K. Sahani, learned counsel for the petitioner, Ms. Bandana
Sinha, learned counsel for the State and Mr. Sanjay Kumar, learned counsel for the informant.
was admitted for treatment for about 8-9 days in Bokaro General Hospital.
-1- A.B.A. No. 643 of 2024
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)
Ajay/
-2- A.B.A. No. 643 of 2024
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner apprehending arrest in a case involving assault with a rod and injuries requiring 8-9 days' treatment.
6 provisions across 1 enactments
Uttam Rai
The State of Jharkhand
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
