Bail application of a petitioner whose trial was at an advanced stage, with 8 of 9 witnesses examined. The court found no change in circumstances and declined to reconsider bail, directing the trial court to conclude the trial preferably by 31 December 2024.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.6334 of 2024
Sheik Abdul @ Bhakul, son of Late Sukhru @ Sukhruddin, R/o Village Chhoti Bhairo Nagar, P.O. & P.S. Balbadda, District Godda.
… … Petitioner.
Versus
The State of Jharkhand. … … Opposite Party.
CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J.
-----
For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tejo Mistry, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Rajneesh Vardhan, A.P.P.
06/ 20.09.2024
It has been stated that 8 out of 9 witnesses have
already been examined in this case.
2. The Trial Court is directed to conclude the trial at the
earliest preferably till 31st December, 2024.
3. There is no change in circumstances.
4. Considering the progress of the trial, I am not inclined
to reconsider the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
5. Accordingly, this Bail Application is dismissed .
6. Copy of this order be faxed immediately to the concerned Trial Court.
(ANANDA SEN, J.)
Prashant. Cp-2
1
Sheik Abdul @ Bhakul
The State of Jharkhand
Ananda Sen
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
