Anticipatory bail application under Sections 326-A/307/377 IPC became infructuous as the petitioner was already arrested during its pendency; application dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.6182 of 2024
Sidratul Islam, S/o Adul Mannan @ Abdul Manna Shekh, R/o village-Sitapahari, P.O.-Sitapahari, P.S.-Pakur (Malpahari), District-Pakur. .......... Petitioner.
-VersusThe State of Jharkhand .......... Opp. Party.
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR
----For the Petitioner : Mr. Gautam Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Suraj Deo Munda, A.P.P. ----- Order No.05 Date: 11.11.2024
Vikas/
(Rajesh Shankar, J.)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sidratul Islam
The State of Jharkhand
Rajesh Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
