In this application for anticipatory bail, the court considered the petitioner's apprehension of arrest in a case involving illegal mining allegations. After hearing counsel and reviewing the record, the court allowed the plea.
Enlargement on anticipatory bail upon furnishing of a bond of Rs. 20,000 with two sureties of the like amount each.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.5776 of 2024
Goberdhan Bans Mahli @ Goverdhan Bans Mahli, S/o Dubraj Bans Mahli, R/o Tola Ghasiya Band, P.O. Baruhatu, P.S. Bundu, District Ranchi. .......... Petitioner.
-VersusThe State of Jharkhand .......... Opp. Party.
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR
For the Petitioner : Mr. Hemant Kr. Shikarwar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Manoj Kumar Mishra, A.P.P. ----- Order No.03 Date: 10.09.2024
(Rajesh Shankar, J.)
Arpit/
-2-
A.B.A. No.5776 of 2024
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail in connection with the alleged offence under Section 414 IPC.
Whether the conditions for release on bail cannot be framed.
4 provisions across 4 enactments
Goberdhan Bans Mahli @ Goverdhan Bans Mahli
The State of Jharkhand
Rajesh Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
