Bail application under sections 376, 420 and 504 IPC in a pending rape trial; earlier bail rejected. Court declined bail given nature of allegations, permitted renewal after victim's evidence.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No. 5323 of 2024
Awadesh Sahu, S/o Late Hari Sahu, aged about 45 years, R/o village Nari, Nawadih, P.O & P.S.-Kisko, District Lohardaga
----Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand ----Opp. Party
CORAM: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ambuj Nath
For the Petitioner: Mr. Altamash Khan, Advocate For the O.P-State: Mr. Sanjay Kr. Srivastava, A.P.P.
not supported the prosecution case.
Petitioner, if so advised, may renew his prayer for bail after recording of the evidence of the victim.
(Ambuj Nath, J)
Ranjeet/ Uploaded
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be released on bail in a pending rape trial where a prosecution witness has not supported the case.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Awadesh Sahu
The State of Jharkhand
Ambuj Nath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
