Bail applications arising from a kidnapping-for-ransom case. The court rejected bail for the petitioner identified by the victim in a test identification parade but allowed bail for the co-petitioner on furnishing bonds with sureties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A No. 471 of 2024 With B.A No. 508 of 2024
Ranveer Kumar Singh@ Ranveer Singh --Petitioner [B.A 471/2024] Parbhat Singh --Petitioner [B.A 508/2024] Versus The State of Jharkhand ----Opp. Party [Both cases]
CORAM: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ambuj Nath
For the Petitioners: Mr. Sudhansu Kr Deo, Advocate For the O.P-State: Mr. Gautam Rakesh, A.P.P.
are being disposed of by the common order.
Heard the parties.
(Ambuj Nath, J)
Ranjeet/
Uploaded
2 issues framed by the court
Should Ranveer Kumar Singh, identified by the victim in T.I. Parade in a kidnapping-for-ransom case, be enlarged on bail?
Should Parbhat Singh, alleged to have confessed involvement, be released on bail under Section 364(A) IPC?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ranveer Kumar Singh @ Ranveer Singh
Parbhat Singh
The State of Jharkhand
Ambuj Nath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
