09/05.09.2024 The petitioner is apprehending his arrest for the offences punishable under Sections 498-A/323/379/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case and has not committed any offence as alleged in the complaint leading to lodging of the present F.I.R under Sections 498-A/323/379/506/34 of I.P.C. It is further submitted that the petitioner is the son-in-law of the complainant/informant. The petitioner’s wife namely, Shajda Tabbasum @ Ruksar has also lodged an F.I.R with similar allegation being Asansol P.S. Case No. 30/2020, whereas her mother has filed the present case only with a view to harass the petitioner. In fact, the petitioner has neither made any demand of dowry from his wife – Shajda Tabbasum @ Ruksar nor tortured her for fulfillment of the same. The petitioner and his family members have been implicated in this case due to personal grudge of the informant and her daughter. Moreover, the allegation made in the complaint that the petitioner used to assault his wife, is also false and concocted. Under the said circumstance, he may be given the privilege of
