Successive anticipatory bail application in a Madhuban P.S. case involving multiple IPC sections; counsel failed to show change in circumstances, so the court declined to entertain it and dismissed the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.5660 of 2024
Abodh Yadav .......... Petitioner.
-Versus-
The State of Jharkhand .......... Opp. Party.
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR
For the Petitioner : Mr. Vikash Anand, Advocate For the State : Mr. Achinto Sen, A.P.P. ----- Order No.02 Date: 04.09.2024
Arpit/
circumstance so as to prefer successive anticipatory bail application with respect to the same criminal case i.e. Madhuban P.S. Case No.65 of 2022, I am not inclined to entertain it.
(Rajesh Shankar, J.)
-2-
A.B.A. No.5660 of 2024
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a successive anticipatory bail application without change in circumstances should be entertained.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Abodh Yadav
The State of Jharkhand
Rajesh Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
