The applicant sought anticipatory bail in an organized crime case. The High Court rejected the prayer, holding that bail could not be granted given the organized nature of the offense.
Prayer for anticipatory bail of the applicant(s) is rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A. No. 4380 of 2023
Sanjay Kumar Sahu …. Applicant(s) Versus The State of Jharkhand …. Opp. Party ----CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR -----For the Applicant(s) : Mr. Rupesh Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. P.K. Chatterjee, A.P.P.
04/25.01.2024: Heard the parties.
(Rajesh Kumar, J.)
Ravi/ Uploaded
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the applicant who is accused under Sections 414 and 34 IPC, Section 54 of JMCR 2004 and Section 13 of JMPIMTS alleging organized crime.
Sanjay Kumar Sahu
Rajesh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
