Bail application by an accused in a murder case where prosecution relies on extra-judicial confession and recovery of the weapon. Bail rejected given the nature of allegations, with a direction to the trial court to expedite the trial.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 3926 of 2024
------
Dashrath Purty, aged about 32 years, S/o. Bhimsen Purty, R/o. Vill.Ralibera, Tola Chirusai, P.O. & P.S.- Badampahar, Dist.- Mayurbhanj, Odisha. … … Petitioner
-Versus -
The State of Jharkhand ... … Opposite Party
CORAM: - HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMBUJ NATH
For the Petitioner : Mr. Vishal Kr. Tiwary, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sudhir Kumar Mahto, A.P.P.
07/11.11.2024
Heard the parties.
(AmbujNath, J.)
Rahul/-
1 issue framed by the court
Should the accused in a murder case based on extra-judicial confession and recovery of the murder weapon be released on bail?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Dashrath Purty
The State of Jharkhand
Ambuj Nath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
