Petitioner sought anticipatory bail in a case involving serious allegations including assault and outraging modesty. The court rejected the prayer noting direct allegations in the FIR and opposing submissions by the State and informant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A. B. A. No. 387 of 2024
Bhola Ghosh
...... … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand .…. … Opposite Party -------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioner :Mr. Gautam Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Nawin Kr. Singh, A.P.P. For the Informant : Mr. Anjani Kumar, Advocate : Mr. Aashish Kumar, Advocate
02/ 13.03.2024 : Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)
satyarthi-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail in connection with the registered FIR?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Bhola Ghosh
The State of Jharkhand
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court