Ashish Kumar Singh Alias Golu Singh Vs the State of Jharkhand

For the Petitioner : Mr. Gopal K. Singh, Advocate Ms. Chanchal Chhaya, Advocate For the State : Mr. Bhola Nath Ojha, Spl.P.P. For Union of India : Mr. Ravi Prakash, Advocate

¶11

Order No.07/ Dated:25.06.2024

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶13

The petitioner has been made an accused in connection with N.D.P.S. Case No. 46 of 2023 arising out of Rail Hatia P.S. Case No. 09 of 2023, registered for the offence under Section 20(b)(ii)(B), 29 of N.D.P.S. Act, pending in the court of learned A.J.C. VII, Ranchi.

¶14

As per FIR, allegation is that from the possession of the petitioner and other co-accused persons, 10kg ganja was recovered.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence as alleged in the FIR. It is submitted that intermediary quantity of ganja has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent. The petitioner is languishing in Judicial custody since 20.05.2023 without any rhymes and reasons. Petitioner undertakes to co-operate in the trial of the case by remaining physically present and participating in the trial as and when required and shall not indulge in any manner in tampering with the prosecution evidences or influencing the witnesses of prosecution, hence, the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.

¶16

Learned Spl.P.P appearing on behalf of State has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submitted that there are sufficient

¶17

materials against the petitioner showing his involvement in the present case, hence he does not deserve bail.

¶18

Regard being had to the facts and circumstances of the case and nature of allegation coupled with materials available against petitioner with no criminal background, I am inclined to release the petitioner, on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/-(Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned A.J.C. VII, Ranchi in connection with N.D.P.S. Case No. 46 of 2023 arising out of Rail Hatia P.S. Case No. 09 of 2023 subject to the conditions:-

¶19

(1) Petitioner shall remain physically present on each and every

¶20

date till the conclusion of the trial of this case unless prevented from sufficient cause to the satisfaction of the learned trial court.

¶21

(2) Petitioner shall not indulge in any or other similar offence till the conclusion of the trial.

¶22

(3) Petitioner shall not indulge in tampering with the prosecution evidences, maneuvering or influencing the prosecution witnesses.

¶23

In case of violation of the aforesaid condition the bail of the petitioner shall be cancelled and shall be taken into custody by the learned trial court itself.

¶24

(Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.)

¶25

R.K/

Ashish Kumar Singh Alias Golu Singh v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ashish Kumar Singh Alias Golu Singh v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Lakhendra Thakur Vs The State Of Jharkhand

Sarwari Khatoon Vs the State of Jharkhand

Ritesh Kumar Tiwary Alias Nikhil Alias Ritesh Vs the State of Jharkhand

Tehrun Bibi Vs the State of Jharkhand

Sandeep Oraon Vs the State of Jharkhand

Badal Turi Alias Chhotan Turi Vs the State of Jharkhand