Allowed

Lalmuni Tiwari v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC19 Jan 2024A.B.A./10275/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail application, the High Court of Jharkhand granted privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The petitioner was directed to appear before the trial court within six weeks and deposit cash security with conditions regarding cooperation in the investigation.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted; petitioner directed to surrender within six weeks and deposit Rs. 20,000 cash security with two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each.

Lalmuni Tiwari Vs the State of Jharkhand — Anticipatory Bail | Jharkhand HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.10275 of 2023

¶2

------

¶3

Lalmuni Tiwari

¶4

.... .... …. Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Jharkhand

¶7

.... .... .... Opposite Party

¶8

------

¶9

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

¶10

For the Petitioner : Mr. Sheo Kr. Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Vijay Kr. Sinha, Addl.P.P

¶11

Order No:-04 Dated:-19-01-2024

¶12

Heard the parties.

¶13

Apprehending his arrest in connection with Haidarnagar P.S. Case No.121 of 2021 instituted under Sections 380, 457 of the Indian Penal Code, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail.

¶14

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner committed theft and lurking house trespass. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that though the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. yet he has been implicated in this case only on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused persons. Drawing attention of this Court towards para-08 of the instant bail application, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the investigation of the case and to furnish sufficient security including cash security. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be given the privileges of anticipatory bail.

¶15

Learned Addl.P.P appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

¶16

Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within six weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrendering, he will be enlarged on bail on depositing Rs.20,000/- as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand)

¶17

with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M.F.C., Palamau at Daltonganj in connection with Haidarnagar P.S. Case No.121 of 2021 with the condition that he will co-operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the pendency of the case and further conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶18

(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J . )

¶19

Animesh/

Lalmuni Tiwari v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Lalmuni Tiwari v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kanti Devi Vs The State Of Jharkhand And Ors.

Kusum Agarwal Vs The State Of Jharkhand Through The Deputy Commissioner Collector And Anr.

M/S.B.C.C.L. Vs Their Workmen And Anr.

Kirti Kaj Srivastava Vs the State of Jharkhand

Manish Pal Vs the State of Jharkhand

Umesh Kumar Barnwal Vs the State of Jharkhand