The High Court of Jharkhand permitted the withdrawal of the written petition to allow the petitioner to avail an alternative remedy by appealing to the appellate authority.
Permission was accorded to withdraw the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P.(T) No. 888 of 2023
M/s R.K. Construction through Rashid Ashraf Khan
Versus The Assistant Commissioner, C.G.S.T. & Central Excise, Ramgarh ..... Respondent
CORAM: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay Hon’ble Mr. Justice Deepak Roshan
For the Petitioner : Mr. Anjani Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Amit Kumar, C.G.C.
03/ 18.05.2023 Mr. Anjani Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application in order to avail alternative remedy of appeal before the appellate authority.
(Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J.)
(Deepak Roshan, J.)
sm/pramanik.
M/s R.K. Construction through Rashid Ashraf Khan
The Assistant Commissioner, C.G.S.T. & Central Excise, Ramgarh
Rongon Mukhopadhyay
Deepak Roshan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
