The High Court of Jharkhand allowed the petitioner's interlocutory application to condone a delay of 107 days in filing a restoration application and restored the dismissed appeal F.A. No. 317 of 2018 to its original file.
Delay of 107 days in preferring restoration application was condoned and appeal F.A. No. 317 of 2018 restored to its original file.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
C.M.P. No. 9 of 2020
------
Durgesh Chandra Pan. --- Petitioner
Versus
Coram: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN
-------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Jitendra Shankar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent : --------
I.A. No. 11236 of 2022
04/15.5.2023 This interlocutory application has been preferred by the petitioner for condoning a delay of 107 days in filing the restoration application.
Having been satisfied with the reasons assigned in the instant application, the same is allowed and the delay of 107 days in preferring the restoration application is condoned.
I.A. No. 11236 of 2022 stands disposed of.
C.M.P. No. 9 of 2020
This interlocutory application has been preferred by the petitioner for restoration of F.A. No. 317 of 2018, which was dismissed for non-compliance of the order dated 5.8.2019.
Having been satisfied with the reasons assigned in the instant application, the same is allowed and F.A. No. 317 of 2018 is restored to its original file.
(Rongon Mukhopadhyay,J)
(Deepak Roshan, J)
Rakesh/-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the delay of 107 days in filing a restoration application should be condoned.
Whether the appeal F.A. No. 317 of 2018 should be restored to its original file.
Durgesh Chandra Pan
Chura Devi
Benga Bati
Rongon Mukhopadhyay
Deepak Roshan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
